Picture this: you are sitting at your desk, headphones on, staring at a blinking cursor on a laptop screen. It is the final round of a national English competition. Instead of handing in a paper essay, you are typing into a secure browser while an AI-assisted system checks for plagiarism, flags grammar slip, and times your response down to the second. In another window, your speech outline is auto-saved to the cloud and shared with judges hundreds of miles away.
This scene is no longer “the future”; it is becoming the default reality of many English competitions. Technology is reshaping what it means to compete in reading, writing, and speaking. This article, part of our “English Competition Trends” series, zooms in on how technology is transforming the landscape and what that means for you as a student, parent, or educator.
Not long ago, typical English competitions relied on stacks of blue books, sharpened pencils, and ink-smudged fingers. Today, many contests are transitioning to digital formats: online essay submissions, timed writing portals, and virtual reading comprehension tests. Some are fully online; others use hybrid models with in-person supervision and digital tools.
Take a middle school essay contest that previously collected mailed entries. Organizers faced issues with illegible handwriting and postal delays. After switching to an online system, they could accept more participants and redistribute essays to judges in minutes. Typing changed the experience for students: less concern about messy pages and more opportunity to revise on the fly, but it also introduced challenges like navigating word counters and on-screen timers.
Technology changes not just where you compete, but how you think during competitions. Typing allows faster drafting, but can lead to endless editing rather than planning. On-screen reading opens up tools like embedded dictionaries and annotations, but can also foster fatigue or distraction.
Imagine a timed literary analysis round on tablets. Students receive a poem and 40 minutes to respond. One student uses highlighting to mark key phrases and types an outline within five minutes. Another jumps into drafting and spends too much time on the introduction. The first student finishes with a clear argument, while the second runs out of time. The technology is the same, but their strategies differ significantly.
This shift is why competitions increasingly reward digital literacy alongside traditional English skills. Being able to manage digital tools and maintain focus in distracting environments becomes essential.
In our overview, “The State of English Competitions in 2025”, we discussed expanding global participation, driven largely by technology. Features like online entry forms and practice materials lower barriers like distance and mailing costs, allowing more voices and perspectives in competitions.
As technology becomes integral to communication, English competitions reflect that change. Many contests now include components beyond traditional essays or speeches, such as digital storytelling and multimedia presentations.
Consider a high school competition with a “multimodal argument” category. Students must create a persuasive piece combining text, images, and audio. One team writes a script and adds voice-over commentary and images; another uses text captions and charts on reading habits. Judges assess the argument's clarity and how well the media elements enhance the message.
Traditional speech competitions are increasingly supplemented or replaced by video and audio formats. Students might record spoken-word performances, submit podcast analyses, or participate in live-streamed debates with digital timers and audience questions via chat.
In a video poetry recitation competition, participants set up their phones in quiet rooms, focusing on framing and sound quality. Some contests even permit editing, necessitating a balance between refinement and authenticity.
For example, a “critical listening” event might require students to listen to a podcast excerpt and respond in writing about its argument and tone. This format would have been difficult to manage in a paper-only era, but is now becoming standard.
Technology allows competitions to incorporate game-like elements that engage students. Online platforms can host reading challenges with digital badges, timed mini-games, or live leaderboards. While final competitions might still be judged traditionally, the preparation feels interactive.
For instance, a spelling and vocabulary contest might offer an ongoing “word quest” where students earn points for mastering vocab sets and completing quizzes. These activities prepare them for live competitions with measured digital practice behind them.
One significant shift in English competitions is the role of AI in scoring. Some contests employ automated essay scoring tools to streamline the process, especially with thousands of entries. These systems can analyze grammar and vocabulary, helping human judges focus on a smaller pool.
Imagine a national writing competition receiving 10,000 submissions. AI can flag significant issues or categorize responses, enhancing efficiency. However, concerns arise about creative essays being underrated due to unconventional structures.
To address this, most high competitions still depend on human judgment for final decisions, ensuring AI support does not overshadow expert readers.
Before competitions begin, students increasingly use AI-powered tools for drafting. Advanced systems can suggest edits or generate outlines, raising issues of fairness and authenticity.
Consider two students prepping for a persuasive essay contest. One uses a grammar checker, while the other employs an AI system to produce detailed outlines. While their essays may appear polished, the effort and skill development differ vastly.
Many competitions are clarifying rules regarding AI use, some permitting basic tools while prohibiting AI-generated content. As a competitor, understanding these rules is essential for ethical growth.
Analytics can significantly enhance preparation. Platforms like ScholarComp’s competition guides can track performance over time, revealing patterns and weaknesses. This focused data allows students to target their practice effectively.
For instance, a student preparing for a reading comprehension contest might discover consistent struggles with inference questions on non-fiction. Armed with this insight, they and their coach can design targeted practice sessions to improve these skills.
One of the greatest promises of technology in English competitions is broader access. Digital resources mean students in remote areas can compete without traveling. However, reliable devices and internet access are still crucial for equity.
A student in a small town can leverage online resources and digital materials to train for competitions that felt unapproachable. However, students lacking access may find themselves disadvantaged despite competitions claiming “open to all.”
As contests shift online, digital skills become unspoken prerequisites. Students adept at managing technology may benefit from this transition, while others might find themselves overwhelmed.
In a video-conferencing speech competition, one student prepares ahead, while another struggles to unmute at the last moment. Both may have strong content, but the second's performance suffers due to technological challenges rather than speaking ability.
As discussed in more depth in “Diversity and Inclusion in English Competitions”, many organizers aim to ensure technology expands access. This includes offering loaner devices or offline practice packets and improving accessibility with features like captions and adjustable font sizes.
The most successful competitors will deepen their language skills and become comfortable with digital tools. Reading across genres and practicing various writing forms are essential. Recording speeches and using free online resources can strengthen technical foundations.
For digital fluency, practice typing timed responses, annotating texts, and simulating test conditions. Familiarity with competition platforms can boost confidence on competition day.
Technology can be a powerful training partner if used intentionally. Online practice platforms can provide structured exercises with immediate feedback. AI tools should only be used to enhance, not replace, your work.
Prepare for technological hiccups by creating backup plans: frequently save your work, keep copies in cloud storage, and know how to reconnect quickly if your internet drops.
Support from teachers can facilitate digital writing tasks and mock competitions, while coaches can assist in analyzing practice data. Parents can set up conducive environments and help troubleshoot issues. Your support network acts as a “competition tech team,” improving your preparation.
Technology profoundly impacts English competitions, changing formats, valued skills, and preparation strategies. Yet the essence of these competitions remains: understanding, analyzing, and communicating ideas effectively.
Embrace both classic skills and modern fluency to excel in upcoming English competitions. To explore more resources and events, browse additional content on ScholarComp and find your next English challenge in this evolving landscape.
Helpful?