Imagine a high school student standing in a silent auditorium, clutching notecards, waiting to pitch a business plan to judges. Now imagine three students in different cities, collaborating live on a shared financial model and refining their slide deck in the cloud, preparing to present their marketing strategy to an international panel over video conference. Both teams are competing in business, but the second scene feels very different.
In just a few years, technology has reshaped business competitions—how teams form, conduct research, build prototypes, and pitch ideas. Here on ScholarComp, we've seen students shift from paper-based business plans to interactive presentations built with tools once reserved for real-world startups.
This article, part of our “Business Competition Trends” series, explores how technology is changing business competitions today and what that means for students, coaches, and organizers. While “The State of Business Competitions in 2025” looks at the broader landscape, this guide focuses on one powerful force behind these changes: the integration of digital tools and innovation at every stage of the competitive journey.
The biggest barrier to entering a business competition used to be geography. If you didn’t live near a major city or competition hub, participation was unlikely. Technology is erasing that barrier, transforming business competitions into global opportunities.
Consider a small-town student interested in entrepreneurship but with no local business club. Ten years ago, they might have relied on textbook examples. Today, they can join an online pitch competition, access video workshops from university mentors, and receive feedback from judges in different countries—all from home. Online registration and digital pitches allow students from rural or under-resourced schools to compete alongside those from well-funded institutions. A team from a farming community successfully pitched their agricultural supply-chain app using a simple video platform, placing in a national competition they couldn't attend in person.
Platforms like ScholarComp help students find these opportunities by browsing competition calendars and digital rulebooks from one place.
Many business competitions now use hybrid or fully asynchronous formats. Teams submit recorded pitches and digital financial models and receive written feedback or live Q&A sessions that can be scheduled across time zones.
A recent high school competition introduced a “global track” where teams submitted a 7-minute pre-recorded pitch followed by a 15-minute live Q&A with judges. A South Asian team, unable to afford travel costs, impressed judges with their data-driven marketing plan. Without digital tools, their idea might never have reached that stage.
Technology is changing how teams prepare. The students who succeed in today’s business contests often use digital tools to research deeply, analyze data, and iterate quickly.
Previously, teams estimated market size by guessing. Now, accessible databases and social media analytics allow validation similar to real startups. Imagine a team working on an eco-friendly clothing subscription service. Instead of vague customer estimates, they use demographic data and online surveys to gauge interest and structure their pitch with data-driven strategies supported by charts.
Digital tools make practice more efficient. For example, teams now record practice sessions and review their performance to improve their pitches. One team preparing for a regional competition practiced online weekly with a mentor, honing their story through detailed feedback. By the presentation day, they had rehearsed dozens of times—enabled by technology.
As competitions demand cross-disciplinary teams, collaboration tools have become essential. Cloud-based documents allow students with busy schedules to work together effectively. A team may have members engaged in sports or family duties, but shared documents enable them to contribute at different times, mirroring real startup environments.
On competition day, technology shapes the experience for participants, judges, and organizers. The process has become a data-rich, real-time event.
Judges now often score teams using digital forms, enabling real-time analytics. For instance, a national business competition evaluates teams on criteria like innovation and feasibility, providing detailed feedback after the event, which helps students know where to improve.
Teams now incorporate live demos and interactive prototypes into their pitches. A group pitching a language-learning platform could show a live demo, while another with a hardware product might present a 3D animation. These tech advantages come with risks; a team that lost internet connectivity mid-pitch impressed judges with their quick adaptability by shifting to screenshots. Competitions are learning to clarify rules about backups and offline functionality.
Livestreaming final rounds has turned competitions into public events. Family and potential investors can watch online, creating new opportunities for engagement. In one regional challenge, audience voting for a “People’s Choice” award led a team to mentorship from a local entrepreneur after they gained visibility through the broadcast.
With technology embedded in competitions, expectations for participants are shifting. Judges expect digital literacy, data awareness, and ethical considerations in technology use.
Teams that interpret analytics, build prototypes, or streamline operations using automation tools gain an advantage. For instance, a team pitching a subscription box for STEM toys used data to devise a promotional plan based on seasonal interests, impressing judges with their data-driven decisions.
Competitions increasingly stress ethical criteria, prompting teams to reflect on privacy, data security, and social impact. For example, a team proposing an AI-powered hiring platform must address algorithmic biases and outline their data protection measures, emphasizing the “should you build it?” over simply “can you build it?”
Students can now use AI tools to draft marketing plans and business models. Competitions are introducing guidelines resembling citation rules to ensure responsible use of these tools, requiring teams to disclose AI use and explain their work in their own words.
The impact of technology on business competitions is complex, posing practical questions for participants and mentors: What should you do differently now?
Teams should select essential tools for collaboration, financial modeling, market research, and presentations. Treat your tech stack like a “virtual briefcase,” deciding on document storage, task tracking, and feedback collection early to maximize creativity and insight.
Coaches should focus on core skills that transfer across applications, like structuring financial models and interpreting results. Simple ethics checkpoints can promote critical thinking about digital choices alongside business concepts.
Organizers face challenges in leveraging technology without creating inequities. They can specify which technologies are optional or required, offer low-tech submission options, and establish centralized support, ensuring a level playing field for all participants.
Business competitions have always been about more than winning. They are laboratories for students to learn entrepreneurial thinking, communication, and decision-making. Technology not only changes the tools and expectations but also broadens possibilities.
From cloud collaboration and data-driven research to AI-assisted innovation, digital integration is present at every competition stage. Those who adapt—using technology to deepen insights, broaden access, and raise ethical standards—will enhance their performance and prepare for the business world ahead.
As you plan your next season, look to leverage technology as an amplifier of your best ideas. Explore more business competition resources on ScholarComp to find challenges and strategies that align with your digital goals.
Helpful?