At 8:02 a.m., the hotel ballroom doors slide open, revealing a wave of sound: rolling suitcase wheels, judges chatting, printers humming, and teams rehearsing elevator pitches. You clutch a tri-fold presentation board and note cards, wondering if everyone else is secretly more prepared.
In that moment, “business competition” becomes real. You see teams in matching blazers, mentors with color-coded binders, and a volunteer fixing a projector. Your mind races with questions: Where do we check in? Are we underdressed? What if we forget our lines?
This ScholarComp guide gives you an inside look at the competition day from check-in to the closing ceremony, helping you to navigate with confidence. Whether preparing for DECA role-plays, FBLA presentations, Junior Achievement pitch contests, or school-based shark tank events, each stage is more similar than you might think.
Most students imagine competition day as one long presentation. In reality, it starts early with small decisions that shape your entire experience.
Consider Maya’s team arriving at a regional competition 45 minutes early. While others rush in, they find the schedule, locate their presentation slot, and test their slides on a spare projector. When a volunteer mentions that some rooms lack HDMI adapters, they quickly borrow one and avoid a crisis.
Arriving early allows time for three key tasks: orienting yourself, confirming logistics, and calming nerves. You find prep rooms, assess the distance to your presentation room, and see the “unofficial” side: judges chatting and organizers setting up.
Check-in tables typically feature laptops, name badges, and schedules, but they determine your day’s flow. You’ll typically receive:
When Jamal’s team checked in, they noticed a time penalty rule: going over by 30 seconds costs points. They adjusted their pitch accordingly, finishing with 15 seconds to spare while another team lost points.
Check-in is also your chance to ask clarifying questions about rules and logistics.
After check-in, you typically enter a holding area filled with energy: teams huddled over laptops, rehearsing or reviewing financials. Observe strategically:
Platforms like ScholarComp help you preview typical competition rooms, making the scene feel manageable.
The core of competition day occurs in rooms that look the same from the hallway but are where preparation meets real-time decision-making.
Think of Ava’s team walking into their business plan room. They’ve rehearsed their opening, but variables abound: judges flipping through their printed plans and setting timers. A volunteer announces, “Team 14, your time starts now.”
In those first 30 seconds, focus on setting the tone and establishing control:
Teams that skip these moments often seem rushed, which judges notice.
Most competitions impose strict time limits—10 minutes to present, 5 for questions. Students often underestimate how quickly time passes under pressure. Carlos’s team had 15 minutes to read a scenario and then 10 to present. They ended up spending longer than expected summarizing, leaving little time for their key ideas. The clock quietly impacted their performance.
Judges look for your ability to prioritize and communicate clearly within time constraints.
Presentation technology fails more often than expected. Projectors may not recognize laptops, or audio files may not play. How teams respond to these glitches speaks volumes.
At a statewide challenge, a team relied on product demo videos. When the video failed due to Wi-Fi issues, they pulled out printed screenshots. Their composure and backup plan impressed judges as much as their concept.
Having a printed summary or offline visuals turns a potential disaster into a story of professionalism.
Many view the prepared presentation as key and Q&A as secondary. Yet, Q&A often reveals more about teamwork and understanding than the pitch does.
During a competition, when a judge asked Elena’s team how they would handle a cost increase, they pulled up budget assumptions and explained their margin structure. That interaction became crucial in their advancement.
Judges look for acknowledgment when you don’t know something, logical reasoning, and effective team dynamics during Q&A.
Competition day involves hours of waiting between presentations. How you utilize this time can enhance your experience.
After their morning pitch, Priya’s team had hours before the finalists were announced. They replayed every moment, leading to stress. Instead, they could debrief briefly, observe events, or reflect on skills to practice next time.
Platforms like ScholarComp offer prompts to help you shift from emotion to targeted growth goals.
Competition day doubles as a networking opportunity. You meet motivated peers, educators, and local entrepreneurs, all potential connections. Liam struck up a conversation about financial projections, leading to joint practice sessions and later a summer internship. Consider it structured friendliness:
Larger competitions often have workshops or panels. Attending these can provide insights into how judges and professionals think about business. After a national panel, a speaker admitted treating their first competition as a “win or lose” test rather than a learning opportunity. This perspective change significantly improved their experience.
While you wait, judges evaluate performances based on detailed rubrics assessing problem analysis, feasibility, innovation, and more.
Judges don’t just assign a single score. Instead, they review detailed categories and discuss notes. You might overhear snippets like “Team 7 had a strong analysis but lacked a plan.” Understanding this helps you see results as structured evaluations.
When top teams have similar scores, judges engage in group discussion. In one final, two teams with nearly identical scores debated innovation versus implementation. Judges eventually chose based on clarity in handling unexpected questions, which tipped the scales.
Many competitions offer written feedback, which is often overlooked. After a regional event, Sam’s team received valuable comments like “Strong vision, unclear revenue model.” They used this feedback to improve their next pitch.
The day concludes back in the main hall, filled with excitement and anxiety. Awards ceremonies are emotional, and it’s tempting to judge your day by whether your name is called.
However, many teams make progress that isn’t visible in the final results: overcoming public speaking fears or improving financials.
Competition day condenses months of growth into one experience. Regardless of medals, you leave with new skills and clearer goals.
After awards, use the “24-hour rule” to balance reflection:
Ensure that each competition experience informs future ones by using what you learned:
Transform the realities of competition day into action:
Platforms like ScholarComp provide checklists and templates tailored to real experiences.
From the outside, competition day appears as polished presentations and winners. Inside, it’s a human experience filled with nerves, tech issues, and crucial decisions shaping performance and learning.
Understanding how check-in, presentation rooms, judge evaluations, and result interpretations work shifts your perspective. Each competition isn’t just a line on a resume; it’s a powerful learning lab. As you prepare for future events, explore guides, case studies, and tools on ScholarComp to maximize your experience and growth.
Helpful?